S. Parker et al., Comparison of two sampling tools for diagnosis of Tritrichomonas foetus inbulls and clinical interpretation of culture results, J AM VET ME, 215(2), 1999, pp. 231-235
Citations number
28
Categorie Soggetti
Veterinary Medicine/Animal Health
Journal title
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
Objective-To compare sensitivity for diagnosing Tritrichomonas foetus infec
tion in bulls using 2 sampling tools and to calculate negative predictive v
alues for infection.
Design-Randomized clinical trial.
Animals-30 Bos taurus bulls naturally or experimentally infected with T foe
tus.
Procedure-Preputial scrapings were obtained once/wk for 6 weeks using an ar
tificial insemination pipette and a metal brush; which tool was used first
for each bull was randomly determined. Samples were collected first from th
e left side of the prepuce and then from the right side and placed in comme
rcially available transport media. chi(2) Values and confidence limits were
adjusted for effect of clustering of results by bull.
Results-Significant differences in sensitivity of results were not found be
tween samples collected using the brush or pipette. Using the pipette, sens
itivity was estimated to be 91.6% (95% confidence inter val, 84.3 to 95.7%)
; negative predictive values ranged from 41 to 99% for prevalence of infect
ion of 90 to 5%, respectively. Sensitivity was 88.8% for first sample obtai
ned and 96.1% for second sample obtained.
Conclusions and Clinical Relevance-Collection of preputial scrapings with a
n artificial insemination pipette or a metal brush and use of a commerciall
y available culture system can provide a sensitive diagnostic test for T fo
etus infection in bulls. Calculated negative predictive values indicated th
at 1 or 2 tests would suffice in most clinical situations. For bulls from h
erds in which T foetus is endemic, 2 to 4 tests/bull may be required to ens
ure that each bull is not infected.