Medical students at the Cambridge Clinical School are provided with a list
of 42 core conditions they should encounter and 20 core skills they should
perform during their attachment. By self-completion questionnaires we asses
sed their clinical experience and the amount of teaching they received, rel
ating the results to marks gained in end-of-attachment assessments.
103 (93%) of 110 students in year one and 123 (96%) of 128 in year two comp
leted the questionnaires. Of the 42 core conditions, 13 were seen by under
70% of the students in year one. In year two, exposure rate increased for 2
6 core conditions by a median of 7% (range 2-40) and decreased in 13 core c
onditions by a median value 4% (range 5-13) (P=0.0005, chi(2)). Only mandat
ory core skills were performed by over 90% of students. 5% of students did
not perform any newborn examinations and under 60% observed neonatal resusc
itation or a high-risk delivery. Students' core condition score was associa
ted with their core skill score (r=0.5), hospital grade (r=0.3) and exposur
e to acute paediatrics (r=0.3) (P<0.005). There was no significant associat
ion between clinical experience and the objective examination score or the
amount of teaching received. There was an inverse association between the n
umber of students at a hospital and the number of core conditions with an e
xposure rate above 70% at that hospital (r=0.7, P<0.05).
This study suggests that clinical experience may be better judged by the cl
inical supervisor than by assessment of theoretical knowledge.