Background Repair of a groin hernia is one of the most common elective oper
ations performed in general surgery. Our aim was to compare laparoscopic re
pair with open repair of groin hernia.
Methods 928 patients with groin hernia, from 26 hospitals in the UK and Ire
land, were randomly assigned to laparoscopic repair (n=468) or to open hern
ia repair (n=460 of which 433 were tension-free mesh repairs). Patients wer
e clinically assessed at 1 week and 1 year after surgery, and were sent que
stionnaires at 3 months and 1 year. The primary endpoints were: complicatio
ns; return to usual activities of social life las the most generally applic
able example of return to usual activities); hernia recurrence; groin pain
that persisted at 1 year; and costs to the health services. All analyses we
re by intention to treat.
Findings At 1 week, at least one complication was found in 108 (29.9%) pati
ents allocated to laparoscopic repair and in 155 (43.5%) patients allocated
to open repair (95% CI for difference -20.6% to -6.6%, p<0.001). There wer
e three serious surgical complications all of which occurred in the laparos
copic group. Patients in the laparoscopic group returned to the usual activ
ities of social life sooner than the patients in the open repair group (10
[IQR 7-21] vs 14 [7-28] days. p=0.004). At 1 year after the operation, the
laparoscopic group had a lower rate of persistent groin pain than those who
had open repair (28.7% vs 36.7% [95% CI for difference -14.7% to -1.4%], p
=0.018). However, all seven hernia recurrences occurred in the laparoscopic
group and not in the open repair group (1.9% vs 0.0% [95% CI for differenc
e 0.5% to 3.4%], p=0.017).
Interpretation Although laparoscopic hernia repair has advantages for patie
nts, concerns about safety indicate that open repair is the more appropriat
e option for the general surgeon. Our findings lend support to the move tow
ards laparoscopic hernia surgery becoming part of the domain of specialist
surgeons.