Research has demonstrated an elevated risk of burglary following an in
itial incident. The present study examines the time course of repeat v
ictimization, and extends understanding by examining the relationships
between repeat victimization and deprivation, and burglary 'hotspots'
. Consistent with other studies, the rate of repeat victimization was
higher than that expected on the basis of statistical likelihood. inte
restingly, the time course of repeat victimization conformed to an exp
onential model. Two alternative hypotheses are presented to attempt to
explain this relationship. One highlights the increased vulnerability
of a household following an initial burglary; the other attempts to e
xplain the variation in repeat victimization in terms of characteristi
cs of the offender. Other findings indicate a clear relationship betwe
en repeat victimization and deprivation, and suggest that the geograph
ical location of repeat victimizations may well contribute to the defi
nition of burglary 'hotspots'. The results have clear implications for
proactive policing and policy making.