Speech perception test results were obtained from a group of 40 pediatric c
ochlear implant users, Half of the children participated in oral-only habil
itation programs, which included both traditional oral and auditory-verbal
approaches, and half participated in programs that used a combination of or
al and manual communication referred to as total communication (TC). Analys
is of the scores showed that children enrolled in oral-only habilitation pr
ograms scored significantly higher on the speech perception measures than d
id children who were enrolled in total communication-based programs. These
results were inconsistent with those of other reports, which suggested that
communication methods had little effect on implant outcomes. To further ex
amine the reasons for the differences in performance, we analyzed 7 additio
nal factors, including length of implant use, age at surgery, device type,
socioeconomic status, bilingualism school setting, and participation in pri
vate therapy, which may affect implant performance, Multiple-regression ana
lysis again showed communication mode to be the factor most highly correlat
ed with speech perception abilities among this group of children.