In recent years, neo-liberal and neo-Weberian scholars have waged fierce de
bates over whether or not the capacity of the nation-states to manage econo
mic activity has been weakened by globalization. While siding with the neo-
Weberians in their assertion that states retain substantial powers, this pa
per argues that both neo-liberals and neo-Weberians share a problematic ass
umption that states are anchored exclusively in the social forces deemed to
lie within their national territories. By contrast, it is argued here that
capitalist development has tended to promote internationalization of capit
al, and with this the internationalization of the state. A theoretical appr
oach to internationalization of the state is then outlined, showing how spe
cific factions of capitalist classes can end up sharing concrete interests
in specific state policies across national boundaries. The potential for tr
ansnational coalitions among various fractions of capital, it is argued, ha
s helped create the current hegemony of neo-liberal approaches among many T
hird World state officials. Internationalization of the state thus suggests
a need to rethink both the bases of Northeast and Southeast Asian economic
growth and the nature of the current crisis afflicting countries in those
regions. It may prove to be the case that the states which played important
roles in Asian industrial development did so less as national entities tha
n as actors within an internationalized system of class and inter-state rel
ations which resulted from historical opportunities no longer available to
most developing countries. (C) 1999 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All
rights reserved.