This experiment was conducted to examine whether the vocal expression of an
ger correlated with cardiovascular reactivity within dyadic interactions. P
articipants selected three social issues on which they had a strong opinion
and, with a confederate who opposed their views, debated these opinions in
each of the three vocal styles. The three vocal styles were (1) Anger-out
during which they described their view in a loud, fast voice, (2) Mood-inco
ngruent during which they described their View in a soft, slow voice, and (
3) Anger-in during which they listened to the confederate oppose their view
and only responded from a list of neutral phrases given to them. Cardiovas
cular reactivity measures (heart rare and blood pressure) were taken during
the initial baseline and the three expression of anger conditions. Both th
e anger-out and mood-incongruent vocal styles significantly correlated with
systolic blood pressure and heart-rate reactivity measures. The disparity
between the results of this experiment and previous ones on anger and cardi
ovascular response may be related to differences in the method of anger-aro
usal (memory-evoked versus dyadic interactions). Results are discussed in t
erms of similarities to active and passive coping and defensiveness.