Results of the scoliosis research society instrument for evaluation of surgical outcome in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis - A multicenter study of 244 patients
Tr. Haher et al., Results of the scoliosis research society instrument for evaluation of surgical outcome in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis - A multicenter study of 244 patients, SPINE, 24(14), 1999, pp. 1435-1440
Study Design. An outcome questionnaire was constructed to evaluate patient
satisfaction and performance and to discriminate among patients with adoles
cent idiopathic scoliosis.
Objectives. To determine reliability and validity in a new quality-of-life
instrument for measuring progress among scoliosis patients.
Summary of Background Data. Meta-analysis of the surgical treatment of adol
escent idiopathic scoliosis determined that a uniform assessment of outcome
did not exist. In addition, patient measures of well-being as opposed to p
rocess measures (e.g., radiographs) were not consistently reported. This es
tablished the need for a standardized questionnaire to assess patient measu
res in conjunction with process measures.
Methods. The instrument consists of 24 questions divided into seven equally
weighted domains as determined by factor analysis: pain, general self-imag
e, post operative self-image, general function, overall level of activity,
postoperative function, and satisfaction. The questionnaire takes approxima
tely 5 minutes to complete and is taken at predetermined time intervals. A
total of 244 of patients from three different sites responded to the questi
onnaire.
Results. The reliability based on internal consistency was confirmed with a
Cronbach's alpha coefficient greater than 0.6 for each domain. In addition
, acceptable correlation coefficient values greater than 0.68 were obtained
for each domain by the test-retest method on normal controls. Similarly, t
o establish validity of the questionnaire, responses of normal high school
students were compared with that of the patients. Consistent differences we
re noted in the domains between the two groups with P < 0.003. The largest
differences were in pain (control, 29.96 +/- 0.20; patient, 13.23 +/- 5.55)
and general level of activity (control, 14.96 +/- 0.20; patient, 12.16 +/-
3.23). Examination of the relationship between the domains and patient sat
isfaction showed that pain correlates with satisfaction to the greatest deg
ree (Pearson's correlation co-efficient, r = -0.511; P < 0.001), followed b
y self-image(r = 0.412; P < 0.001).
Conclusions. This questionnaire addresses patient measures for evaluation o
f outcome in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery by examining several d
omains. It also allows for dynamic monitoring of scoliosis patients as they
become adults. This is a validated instrument with goad reliability measur
es.