Ml. Gatton et al., Spine update - Difficulties in estimating muscle forces from muscle cross-sectional area - An example using the psoas major muscle, SPINE, 24(14), 1999, pp. 1487-1493
Most biomechanical models use muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) as an indic
ator of maximum isometric muscle force. In general, there are multiple esti
mates of CSA for the same muscle. For example, numerous studies have estima
ted the CSA of the psoas major muscle using different subject populations a
nd positions. However, few studies have combined the available information
to obtain an overall estimate of CSA or investigated the effect different s
ubject characteristics may have on CSA. In the present update, nine studies
that reported psoas major CSA or physiologic CSA were compared with respec
t to subject characteristics, methodology, and results. Corrections to cada
veric data were made to adjust physiologic CSA to CSA. Comparison of report
ed values for living subjects indicated that females have smaller mean CSA
than males for the psoas major muscle and that body size does not significa
ntly influence muscle CSA in males. Areas derived from cadaveric data were
smaller than similar studies on living subjects, possibly because of subjec
t age, removal of tendinous and fatty components of fascicles, and lack of
detailed data for fascicle angles in the supine position. Results indicate
that researchers who use muscle CSA in biomechanical models should carefull
y assess the appropriateness of the data used, particularly in relation to
potential sex differences and the influence of postural changes on CSA.