Comparison of the responses of AII amacrine cells in the dark- and light-adapted rabbit retina

Citation
Dy. Xin et Sa. Bloomfield, Comparison of the responses of AII amacrine cells in the dark- and light-adapted rabbit retina, VIS NEUROSC, 16(4), 1999, pp. 653-665
Citations number
69
Categorie Soggetti
da verificare
Journal title
VISUAL NEUROSCIENCE
ISSN journal
09525238 → ACNP
Volume
16
Issue
4
Year of publication
1999
Pages
653 - 665
Database
ISI
SICI code
0952-5238(199907/08)16:4<653:COTROA>2.0.ZU;2-A
Abstract
We studied the light-evoked responses of AII amacrine cells in the rabbit r etina under dark- and light-adapted conditions. In contrast to the results of previous studies, we found that AII cells display robust responses to li ght over a 6-7 log unit intensity range, well beyond the operating range of rod photoreceptors. Under dark adaptation, AII cells showed an ON-center/O FF-surround receptive-field organization. The intensity-response profile of the center-mediated response component followed a dual-limbed sigmoidal fu nction indicating a transition from rod to cone mediation as stimulus inten sities were increased. Following light adaptation, the receptive-field orga nization of An cells changed dramatically. Light-adapted AII cells showed b oth ON- and OFF-responses to stimulation of the center receptive field, but we found no evidence for an antagonistic surround. Interestingly, the OFF- center response appeared first following rapid light adaptation and was the n replaced gradually over a 1-4 min period by the emerging ON-center respon se component. Application of the metabotropic glutamate receptor agonist AP E, the ionotropic glutamate blocker CNQX, 8-bromo-cGMP, and the nitric oxid e donor SNAP all showed differential effects on the various center-mediated responses displayed by dark- and light-adapted AII cells. Taken together, these pharmacological results indicated that different synaptic circuits ar e responsible for the generation of the different AII cell responses. Speci fically, the rod-driven ON-center responses are apparently derived from rod bipolar cell synaptic inputs, whereas the cone-driven ON-center responses arise from signals crossing the gap junctions between AII cells and ON-cent er cone bipolar cells. Additionally, the OFF-center response of light-adapt ed All cells reflects direct synaptic inputs from OFF-center cone bipolar c ells to AII dendritic processes in the distal inner plexiform layer.