This article examines the production of new history textbooks that appeared
after the breakup of the Soviet Union. It is argued that the radical revis
ions in official history in this context are shaped by the Bakhtinian proce
ss of "hidden dialogicality," whereby new, post-Soviet narratives respond t
o earlier Soviet narratives in various ways. It is argued that different fo
rms of hidden dialogicality are employed to revise official accounts of the
Russian Civil War and World War II. In the former case, new texts respond
to their Soviet precursors through processes of "re-emplotment," whereas in
the case of World War II, the plot is left largely unchanged, but the main
characters are changed. Although many political, cultural, and economic fo
rces play a role in the revision of any official history, if is argued that
the importance of hidden dialogicality between narrative forms needs to be
taken into account as well.