Plant molecular systematics, classical systematics, and morphological cladistics: Comments on the article of A.S. Antonov

Authors
Citation
Ja. Doyle, Plant molecular systematics, classical systematics, and morphological cladistics: Comments on the article of A.S. Antonov, ZH OBS BIOL, 60(3), 1999, pp. 344-350
Citations number
34
Categorie Soggetti
Biology
Journal title
ZHURNAL OBSHCHEI BIOLOGII
ISSN journal
00444596 → ACNP
Volume
60
Issue
3
Year of publication
1999
Pages
344 - 350
Database
ISI
SICI code
0044-4596(199905/06)60:3<344:PMSCSA>2.0.ZU;2-F
Abstract
Many conflicts between genosystematics and phenosystematics discussed in th e review by A.S. Antonov reflect methods of analysis rather than kinds of d ata; cladistic analyses of morphological data agree more with molecular ana lyses. Molecular data have important limitations, and studies of both molec ules and morphology will be: needed for a complete understanding of plant e volution.