Comparison of F-, G- and N-based RT-PCR protocols with conventional virological procedures for the detection and typing of turkey rhinotracheitis virus

Citation
Mh. Bayon-auboyer et al., Comparison of F-, G- and N-based RT-PCR protocols with conventional virological procedures for the detection and typing of turkey rhinotracheitis virus, ARCH VIROL, 144(6), 1999, pp. 1091-1109
Citations number
41
Categorie Soggetti
Microbiology
Journal title
ARCHIVES OF VIROLOGY
ISSN journal
03048608 → ACNP
Volume
144
Issue
6
Year of publication
1999
Pages
1091 - 1109
Database
ISI
SICI code
0304-8608(1999)144:6<1091:COFGAN>2.0.ZU;2-E
Abstract
Fifty-six reverse transcriptions followed by a polymerase chain reaction (R T-PCR) were developed and/or assessed to detect and to type turkey rhinotra cheitis virus (TRTV). Twenty-seven primers corresponding to sequences eithe r common to both A and B viruses, or type-specific were respectively define d in the fusion (F), attachment (G) and nucleocapsid (N) proteins genes. On ly one N-based RT-PCR detected 21/21 TRTVs isolated in four countries since 1985. Molecular typing (RT-PCR) and antigenic typing (ELISA) showed that T RTV strains antigenically related either to the 3BOC18 (UK/85/1) or to the 86004 (Fr/86/1) viruses belonged to the A or B genomic type respectively. N either typing approach allowed assignment of two 1985 French isolates (Fr/8 5/1 and Fr/85/2) to either type A or B, these strains might thus belong to a third type. RT-PCR assays on tracheal and nasal swabs sampled during expe rimental and field infections significantly outperformed concurrent virus i solation in tissue culture and ELISA: G- and N-based RT-PCRs detected more positive samples than conventional methods. Molecular and serological resul ts were concordant and demonstrated that all the recent French field viruse s belonged to type B. Thus, N- and G- based RT-PCR are respectively specifi c and sensitive tools for rapid diagnosis and typing of TRTV in field sampl es.