Influence of virus strain and antigen mass on efficacy of H5 avian influenza inactivated vaccines

Citation
De. Swayne et al., Influence of virus strain and antigen mass on efficacy of H5 avian influenza inactivated vaccines, AVIAN PATH, 28(3), 1999, pp. 245-255
Citations number
30
Categorie Soggetti
Veterinary Medicine/Animal Health
Journal title
AVIAN PATHOLOGY
ISSN journal
03079457 → ACNP
Volume
28
Issue
3
Year of publication
1999
Pages
245 - 255
Database
ISI
SICI code
0307-9457(199906)28:3<245:IOVSAA>2.0.ZU;2-Q
Abstract
The influence of vaccine strain and antigen mass on the ability of inactiva ted avian influenza (AI) viruses to protect chicks from a lethal, highly pa thogenic (HP) AI virus challenge was studied. Groups of 4-week-old chickens were immunized with inactivated vaccines containing one of 10 haemagglutin in subtype H5 AI viruses, one heterologous H7 AI virus or normal allantoic fluid (sham), and challenged 3 weeks later by intra-nasal inoculation with a HP H5 chicken-origin AI virus. All 10 H5 vaccines provided good protectio n from clinical signs and death, and produced positive serological reaction s on agar gel immunodiffusion and haemagglutination inhibition tests. In ex periment 1, challenge virus was recovered from the oropharynx of 80% of chi ckens in the H5 vaccine group. In five H5 vaccine groups, challenge virus w as not recovered from the cloaca of chickens. In the other five H5 vaccine groups, the number of chickens with detection of challenge virus from the c loaca was Tower than in the sham group (P < 0.05). Reductions in the quanti ty of challenge virus shed from the cloaca and oropharynx were also evident in some H5 vaccinate groups when compared to the sham group. However, ther e was no positive correlation between the sequence identity of the haemaggl utinin gene from the vaccine strain and challenge virus, and the ability to reduce the quantity of challenge virus shed from the cloaca or oropharynx, As the quantity of AI antigen in the vaccines increased, all parameters of protection improved and were virus strain dependent. A/turkey/Wisconsin/68 (H5N9) was the best vaccine candidate of the H5 strains tested (PD50 = 0.00 6 mu g AI antigen). These data demonstrate that chickens vaccinated with in activated H5 whole virus AI vaccines were protected from clinical signs and death, but usage of vaccine generally did not prevent infection by the cha llenge virus, as indicated by recovery of virus from the oropharynx, Vaccin e use reduced cloacal detection rates, and quantity of virus shed from the cloaca and oropharynx in some vaccine groups, which would potentially reduc e environmental contamination and disease transmission in the field.