Whereas efforts encouraging women to obtain initial mammograms are laudable
, the importance of returning for subsequent routine mammograms cannot be m
inimized. The purpose of this study was to measure the timing, patterns, an
d characteristics of repeat screening mammography over time in a defined po
pulation of health maintenance organization members for whom mammography wa
s a fully covered benefit, We identified all women ages 50-74 years who wer
e enrolled in a southeastern Michigan health maintenance organization, assi
gned to a large medical group, and received at least one screening mammogra
m with a normal result between January 1, 1989 and December 31, 1996, Using
administrative and radiology data, we calculated the proportion of women w
ho received a subsequent mammogram within 2 Sears and the time to subsequen
t screening, both overall and stratified by demographic characteristics. We
also examined screening patterns over a 5-year period. Of the 8749 women i
ncluded in this study, 66.0% [95% confidence interval (CI), 65.0-67.0%] wer
e subsequently screened within 2 years. We found slightly higher rates amon
g Caucasians and married women. The proportion of women who received repeat
mammography increased with estimated household income [9.5% difference bet
ween the highest and lowest categories (95% CI, 6.5-12.5%)]. The median tim
e to subsequent screening was 17.7 months, and the probability of repeat sc
reening was higher for women whose initial mammogram was between January 19
92 and December 1994 compared to those receiving an initial mammogram betwe
en January 1989 and December 1991 (9.6% difference; 95% CI, 7.5-11.7%). Rep
eat mammography has improved over time; however, socioeconomic status could
contribute to longer-than-intended intervals between screening when transl
ated into real-world clinical practice. In a setting where most physicians
recommended annual screening, we found that the median time to subsequent s
creening was delayed by 6 months. If annual mammography is the goal, recomm
endations should be made with the understanding of how the timing of repeat
screening occurs in clinical practice.