Comparison of different extraction techniques used for methylmercury analysis with respect to accidental formation of methylmercury during sample preparation
H. Hintelmann, Comparison of different extraction techniques used for methylmercury analysis with respect to accidental formation of methylmercury during sample preparation, CHEMOSPHERE, 39(7), 1999, pp. 1093-1105
Different techniques commonly used to extract monomethylmercury (MMHg) from
various matrices have been screened regarding their potential to accidenta
lly generate MMHg from inorganic Hg2+ during sample preparation. Most of th
e tested techniques, among them alkaline and acidic leaching as well as atm
ospheric pressure distillation, were prone to spurious formation of (CH3Hg)-Hg-200 from Hg-200(2+) added to certified reference materials. 0.006 - 0.
05 % of the added stable inorganic Hg isotope was converted to MMHg. Only l
eaching using a H2SO4/KBr/CuSO4 mixture did not, cause any artifacts. In ce
rtain sediment samples where the MMHg fraction is less than 1%, the degree
of artifactual formation observed can be significant. To calculate the orig
inal MMHg content in such samples the application of a species specific iso
tope addition method (SSIA) is proposed and was evaluated. (C) 1999 Elsevie
r Science Ltd. All rights reserved.