Comparison of different extraction techniques used for methylmercury analysis with respect to accidental formation of methylmercury during sample preparation

Authors
Citation
H. Hintelmann, Comparison of different extraction techniques used for methylmercury analysis with respect to accidental formation of methylmercury during sample preparation, CHEMOSPHERE, 39(7), 1999, pp. 1093-1105
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Environment/Ecology
Journal title
CHEMOSPHERE
ISSN journal
00456535 → ACNP
Volume
39
Issue
7
Year of publication
1999
Pages
1093 - 1105
Database
ISI
SICI code
0045-6535(199909)39:7<1093:CODETU>2.0.ZU;2-F
Abstract
Different techniques commonly used to extract monomethylmercury (MMHg) from various matrices have been screened regarding their potential to accidenta lly generate MMHg from inorganic Hg2+ during sample preparation. Most of th e tested techniques, among them alkaline and acidic leaching as well as atm ospheric pressure distillation, were prone to spurious formation of (CH3Hg)-Hg-200 from Hg-200(2+) added to certified reference materials. 0.006 - 0. 05 % of the added stable inorganic Hg isotope was converted to MMHg. Only l eaching using a H2SO4/KBr/CuSO4 mixture did not, cause any artifacts. In ce rtain sediment samples where the MMHg fraction is less than 1%, the degree of artifactual formation observed can be significant. To calculate the orig inal MMHg content in such samples the application of a species specific iso tope addition method (SSIA) is proposed and was evaluated. (C) 1999 Elsevie r Science Ltd. All rights reserved.