Precipitation change: Model simulations and paleoreconstructions

Zonal-scale patterns of precipitation change, as reconstructed for the Mid- Pliocene and the two Pleistocene optima, are compared with those generated in standard 2 x CO2-1 x CO2 equilibrium experiments by two high-resolution GCMs of equal sensitivities of global precipitation and temperature to CO2 doubling. We find that the three warm paleoclimates, despite differences in boundary conditions/forcings, exhibit a similarity in zonal-scale patterns of change for precipitation over land in the Northern Hemisphere (NH); the between-epoch pattern correlation is 0.9 on the average. The two models gi ve marked differences in zonal distribution of precipitation anomalies at m id-latitudes; the between-model pattern correlation for changes of precipit ation over NH land is 0.4. The response of precipitation over the NH land area to the NH warming is ab out 10%/degrees C in the paleodata compared to 3%/degrees C in the models. The largest model/paleodata descrepancy refers to the present-day desert be lt, where a large precipitation anomaly persists in all epochs. North of 50 N, the absolute values of the zonally-averaged precipitation anomalies sim ulated by both models fall in the range implied by the three warm paleoclim ates, but they are systematically lower than the anomalies of the Mid-Plioc ene. If our reconsructions are valid and if climate changes in the Mid-Plio cene were driven solely by CO2 changes, then our results suggest that model s are underestimating the magnitude of the precipitation response, especial ly in the regions of subtropical deserts; the magnitude of the simulated te mperature response at high latitudes is also underestimated. At least part of the reported model/paleodata discordance appears to be due to lack of in teractive land surface package in the models examined.