This paper reports on a research study carried out in 1993/94, on the child
protection practices of a social work team employed by a regional health b
oard. The aim of the study was to challenge the assumption underlying offic
ial policies and procedures that child protection work is susceptible to bu
reaucratic management.
By exploring the criteria applied by practitioners in both defining and inv
estigating "child abuse" allegations, the study illustrates the way in whic
h judgements are made through an ideologically and pragmatically based fram
ework rather than the technical/rational process implied in official guidan
ce. The research also highlights the way in which Irish child protection wo
rk has followed an international trend of focusing narrowly on incidents wh
ich conform to a "norm" of child abuse and ignoring the wider adversities s
uffered by families and children.