Sampling epigeal arthropods: an evaluation of fenced pitfall traps using mark-release-recapture and comparisons to unfenced pitfall traps in arable crops
Jm. Holland et S. Smith, Sampling epigeal arthropods: an evaluation of fenced pitfall traps using mark-release-recapture and comparisons to unfenced pitfall traps in arable crops, ENT EXP APP, 91(2), 1999, pp. 347-357
The efficiency of fenced pitfall traps for estimating the density of common
ly occurring epigeal predatory beetles was examined using mark-release-reca
pture. Most beetles of those recovered were recaptured within one week of t
heir release. For seven of the ten species tested recapture rates were over
70%, with higher rates for the larger species. The predatory arthropod spe
cies composition captured using fenced pitfall traps was compared to unfenc
ed pitfall traps in winter wheat, spring barley and winter oilseed rape. Co
mpositional analysis revealed that the dominance structure of seven carabid
beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) taxa differed between the trap types and mo
nth of sampling in winter wheat and spring barley, but differences were sma
ll with the exception of a few taxa. Linear relationships between the two t
echniques were found for some carabid and rove beetles (Coleoptera: Staphyl
inidae). The dominance structure of seven linyphiid spider (Araneae: Linyph
iidae) taxa differed between the two trap types in wheat but not barley, al
though large differences were restricted to two taxa. No linear relationshi
ps between the two techniques were found for any of the Linyphiidae examine
d. Rove beetles were more effectively sampled using the fenced compared to
unfenced pitfall traps.