D. Dauenheimer et al., Self-discrepancy and elaboration of self-conceptions as factors influencing reactions to feedback, EUR J SOC P, 29(5-6), 1999, pp. 725-739
Previous research examined the predictions of the self-enhancement theory a
nd the selfconsistency, theory regarding reactions to self-relevant feedbac
k. In the present study two circumstances that are supposed to moderate sel
f-enhancement and self-consistency motives have been examined, the elaborat
ion of a self-conception and the discrepancy, between the actual self and a
personal standard. One hundred and fourteen participants received either p
ositive, consistent, or negative feedback regarding their results on a pers
onality test. Affective and cognitive reactions to fictitious feedback were
measured as dependent variables. In accordance with prior empirical eviden
ce, affective reactions followed the self-enhancement theory and cognitive
reactions Mere in line with the self-consistency theory. Moreover, affectiv
e and cognitive reactions were influenced by the elaboration of a self-conc
eption and the discrepancy between the actual self and a personal standard
as predicted Regarding affective reactions, the predictions of the self-enh
ancement theory were more clearly supported when self-conceptions were less
elaborated or when people perceived a high self-discrepancy. Regarding cog
nitive reactions, the predictions of the self-consistency theory were more
clearly supported when self-conceptions were highly elaborated or when peop
le perceived a low, self-discrepancy. Copyright (C) 1999 John Wiley & Sons,
Ltd.