Jt. Koskinen et al., Seasonal comparison of HUTSCAT ranging scatterometer and ERS-1 SAR microwave signatures of boreal forest zone, IEEE GEOSCI, 37(4), 1999, pp. 2068-2079
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Eletrical & Eletronics Engineeing
Journal title
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING
A set of ERS-1 SAR images along with airborne nonimaging ranging scatterome
ter (HUTSCAT) measurements and in situ surveys has been obtained from the S
odankyla test site (center latitude = 67.41 degrees N, center longitude = 2
6.58 degrees E) in Northern Finland, A total of five measurement campaigns
were organized during 1991-1993, Nineteen test lines have been selected fro
m the test site to represent different land-use categories, The landuse in
the test area consists of open areas (agricultural fields, bogs, and clear-
cut areas) and sparsely forested areas (mires, Dine, and mixed forests). Mi
crowave signatures representing the test lines have been extracted from ERS
-1 SAR images and HUTSCAT measurements, The behavior of these signatures ha
s been compared with each other and with our boreal forest semiempirical ba
ckscattering model. A set of extensive field measurements (snow depth, dens
ity, wetness, coverage, and snow water equivalent) made on the test lines a
re used in the various analyzes.
The results indicate that the behavior of ERS-1 SAR microwave signatures is
similar to that of HUTSCAT even in the presence of forest canopies, Also,
the deviations of microwave signatures for various land-use classes behave
similarly. This allows us to use the boreal forest semiempirical backscatte
ring model based on HUTSCAT data to divide the ERS-1 backscattering signal
into two contributions: 1) backscattering contribution from the top laver o
f vegetation canopy and 2) backscattering contribution from the canopy, gro
und, and ground-canopy reflections. By using the boreal forest semiempirica
l model, the behavior of these contributions is also observed in various so
il conditions (wet ground, frozen ground, dry snow, and wet snow). These re
sults explain some aspects of the boreal forest backscattering mechanism in
the presence of snow cover and met soil, which have not been experimentall
y investigated before.