G. Papia et al., Screening high-risk patients for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus on admission to the hospital: Is it cost effective?, INFECT CONT, 20(7), 1999, pp. 473-477
OBJECTIVES: To determine the cost-effectiveness of a policy of screening hi
gh-risk patients for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) col
onization on admission to hospital.
SETTING: 980-bed university-affiliated tertiary-care hospital.
PATIENTS: Between June 1996 and May 1997, patients directly transferred fro
m another hospital or nursing home, or who had been hospitalized in the pre
vious 3 months, were screened for MRSA within 72 hours of hospital admissio
n.
DESIGN: Nasal, perineal, and wound swabs were obtained for MRSA screening u
sing standard laboratory methods. Laboratory and nursing costs associated w
ith screening patients for MRSA on admission to hospital were calculated. T
he costs associated with the implementation of recommended infection contro
l measures for patients with MRSA also were determined.
RESULTS: 3,673 specimens were obtained from 1,743 patients. MRSA was found
on admission in 23 patients (1.3%), rep resenting 36% of the 64 patients wi
th MRSA identified in the hospital during the year. MRSA-colonized patients
were more likely to have been transferred from a nursing home (odds ratio
[OR], 6.4; P=.04) or to have had a previous history of MRSA colonization (O
R, 13.1; P=.05). Laboratory and nursing costs were found to be $8.34 per sp
ecimen, for a total cost of $30,632 during the year. The average cost of im
plementing recommended infection control measures for patients colonized wi
th MRSA was approximately $5,235 per patient.
CONCLUSION: If early identification of MRSA. in colonized patients prevents
nosocomial transmission of the organism to as few as six new patients, the
screening program would save money.