In the past ten years, daytime talk shows became very popular among te
levision programmers and viewers alike. Given the large audiences to w
hom talk shows communicate, it is important to analyze the messages co
ntained in the programs. Remarkably little academic attention has been
paid to this phenomenon, however. The present study focuses on the pr
esentation of interpersonal conflicts, particularly regarding the beha
viors exhibited by women and men. Gender represents a fundamental way
of categorizing individuals. Our goal was to determine how women and m
en argued in the context of daytime television talk shows. By content
analyzing forty randomly selected talk shows, we found that the female
/male dyad was most likely to be involved in an argument, and that wom
en were more likely to dominate the conflict. Otherwise, women and men
manifested similar behaviors during interpersonal arguments, which is
inconsistent with gender communication research. Possible explanation
s for these findings are addressed.