Do cultural values and traditions influence the development of coping style
s ? To address this question, we compared self-reports of coping by 6-14-ye
ar-olds in Thailand and the U.S. One hundred and forty-one children were in
terviewed about six common stressors: separation from a friend, injection i
n a doctor's office, adult anger, peer animosity, school failure, and physi
cal injury. Children's self-reported coping methods were coded as overt or
covert. Coping goals were coded as reflecting primary control (attempts to
influence objective conditions), secondary control (attempts to adjust ones
elf to objective conditions), or relinquished control. Although findings re
vealed numerous cross-national similarities, there were also multiple main
and interaction effects involving culture, suggesting that sociocultural co
ntext may be critical to our understanding of child coping. Consistent with
literature on Thai culture, Thai children reported more than twice as much
covert coping as American children for stressors involving adult authority
figures (i.e. adult anger, injection in doctor's office). Thai children al
so reported more secondary control goals than Americans when coping with se
paration, but American children were five times as likely as Thais to adopt
secondary control goals for coping with injury. The findings support a mod
el of coping development in which culture and stressor characteristics inte
ract, with societal differences most likely to be found in situations where
culture-specific norms become salient.