Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of CT angiog
raphy (CTA) for the assessment of carotid bifurcation stenosis, using inter
active volume rendering (VR), maximum intensity projection (MIP), and 2D tr
ansverse CT technique (t-CT).
Method: Nineteen consecutive patients were prospectively studied with CTA a
nd selective digital subtraction angiography (DSA), There were 13 men and 6
women from 51 to 84 years old (mean 70 years). Results of DSA were compare
d with those of interactive VR, MIP, and conventional t-CT results, using N
orth American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial criteria for stenosi
s grading.
Results: There were a total of 38 carotid bifurcations studied, with 9 mild
, 10 moderate, and 15 severe stenoses and 4 occlusions. Overall agreement w
ith DSA for VR was achieved in 76%. Eighty percent of the severe stenoses w
ere correctly predicted by VR. The overall agreement between t-CT and DSA w
as 89%. MIP images, when analyzed independently, showed an overall agreemen
t with angiography of only 71%. VR was not significantly different from MIP
(p = 0.60). The difference between VR and t-CT had borderline significance
(p = 0.09). MIP had significantly poorer agreement with angiography than t
-CT (p = 0.02).
Conclusion: CTA has a high degree of accuracy for the assessment of carotid
artery disease compared with catheter angiography. Interactive VR increase
s the accuracy of diagnosing carotid stenosis and decreases the number of u
nsatisfactory studies as compared with MIP. Further advances in computation
speeds and improvements in software may dramatically alter the future use
of VR for the communication of results to clinicians; however, careful anal
ysis of transverse sections is essential to accurate CT interpretation.