Y. Villasenor et H. Waitzkin, Limitations of a structured psychiatric diagnostic instrument in assessingsomatization among Latino patients in primary care, MED CARE, 37(7), 1999, pp. 637-646
Citations number
34
Categorie Soggetti
Public Health & Health Care Science","Health Care Sciences & Services
BACKGROUND. The Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) has bee
n developed as a state-of-the-art, structured diagnostic instrument, design
ed to diagnose psychiatric disorders across cultures and languages. Partly
because it has been validated in a number of countries and cultural setting
s, the CIDI has become widely accepted as a diagnostic instrument in epidem
iologic and clinical research.
OBJECTIVES. AS part of a larger study of psychiatric disorders in a multi-e
thnic, primary care setting, we tried to clarify the limitations of the CID
I in diagnosing somatoform symptoms among Latino patients.
DESIGN. Relevant sections of the CIDI were administered in English or Spani
sh to new patients seeking primary care services at an inner-city, universi
ty-affiliated community clinic. Interviews were tape recorded and pertinent
passages were transcribed for qualitative analysis.
SUBJECTS. One thousand, four hundred and fifty six new patients, comprising
4 ethnic groups: Central American; Mexican; Chicano; and non-Latino White.
MEASURES. The CIDI's diagnostic algorithms for somatization were examined i
n relation to the transcriptions of inter-views for Latino patients whom th
e CIDI diagnosed as somatizers.
RESULTS. The CIDI led to the inaccurate identification of somatoform sympto
ms resulting from such issues as financial barriers to healthcare access, c
ultural syndromes that were not recognized by Western medicine, and languag
e differences between patients and physicians. Like other structured instru
ments, the CIDI also forced a range of complex experience into a fixed-choi
ce interview format.
CONCLUSIONS. Despite the advantages of such structured instruments as the C
IDI, their capacity to reach accurate psychiatric diagnoses in same cultura
l groups and clinical settings requires clarification. These findings also
call into question the relatively high rates of somatization among Latino p
atients reported in previous studies that have used structured psychiatric
diagnostic instruments.