The received wisdom on IT chargeback is that a chargeback system with certa
in key characteristics, such as usage-based charges, stable rates, understa
ndable bills, and so forth, will help firms make effective decisions on IT
investment and use. Eccles' model of transfer pricing provides a theoretica
l Framework fbr this claim, and it also explains why chargeback systems can
raise issues of fairness or create conflict between IT and its clients, as
the IT literature has pointed out. Applying Eccles' model, this paper repo
rts on a study of 10 organizations' IT chargeback systems and their impacts
on business managers' economic decisions and on evaluations of IT and busi
ness unit performance. Respondents in just four of the 10 firms reported th
at chargeback had significantly influenced IT investment decisions. In addi
tion, the business unit respondents at those same four firms offered more p
ositive assessments of IT than their counterparts at other sites. These dif
ferences in chargeback-related outcomes could not be accounted for by looki
ng at differences in the chargeback characteristics that are most commonly
described in the IT literature. What was different in these four firms was
that chargeback was being used to foster communication between IT and the b
usiness units. This communication was generating a rich shared understandin
g for both parties of the costs and benefits of alternative IT investments
and service offerings. The literature on partnership argues that complex IT
investment decisions demand a strong IT-business partnership. The analysis
suggests that IT units in just four of the 10 firms were tapping into the
potential of chargeback to facilitate the development of a partnership with
their business unit counterparts.