As our understanding of human impacts on the environment has increased, it
has become clear that we need to move toward a closed-loop industrial socie
ty in order to avoid undesirable health and ecosystem consequences. Achieve
ment of this goal depends on radical technological innovation in both produ
cts and processes. This paper explores how to design public policy mechanis
ms to stimulate rather than impede pollution-preventing technological innov
ation. It begins with a discussion of the role of government in civilian te
chnology development and diffusion. It then sets out six design criteria fo
r policy to promote 'green' technology innovation. Based on this set of des
ign criteria, the article assesses the potential and limitations of current
U.S. policy approaches to stimulate technological innovation that moves us
toward a minimal waste society. The main conclusions of this assessment ar
e as follows. Over the past decade, the U.S. environmental policy system ha
s experienced a variety of reforms and new initiatives,many aimed directly
at promoting environmentally-friendly technological change. The strengths o
f these reforms are to increase the information that the private sector has
about the magnitude and cost of their environmental impacts and to allow g
reater flexibility in the technologies that firms choose to meet environmen
tal regulations and goals. Because of these reforms, firms are likely to un
dertake technological innovation for the environment in situations with cle
ar short-term economic benefits, i.e. to capture the much heralded win-win
potential of environmental regulation. However, these reforms have signific
ant weaknesses as well. Unless policy provides stronger political or econom
ic incentives and clearer signals about future environmental performance re
quirements, we are unlikely to be able to drive technological innovation in
industries where the pay-off is more longterm or uncertain, and thus will
make only limited progress toward the goal of a minimal waste society.