Ie. Dror et Dp. Gallogly, Computational analyses in cognitive neuroscience: In defense of biologicalimplausibility, PSYCHON B R, 6(2), 1999, pp. 173-182
Because cognitive neuroscience researchers attempt to understand the human
mind by bridging behavior and brain, they expect computational analyses to
be biologically plausible. In this paper, biologically implausible computat
ional analyses are shown to have critical and essential roles in the variou
s stages and domains of cognitive neuroscience research. Specifically, biol
ogically implausible computational analyses can contribute to (I) understan
ding and characterizing the problem that is being studied, (2) examining th
e availability of information and its representation, and (3) evaluating an
d understanding the neuronal solution. In the context of the distinct types
of contributions made by certain computational analyses, the biological pl
ausibility of those analyses is altogether irrelevant. These biologically i
mplausible models are nevertheless relevant and important for biologically
driven research.