Subjects named target words that followed a masked prime word of 33-msec (E
xperiments 1A and 1B) or 200-msec (Experiment 2) duration. The target word
was either presented alone or accompanied by an interleaved distracter word
. Targets presented alone were named more quickly following an identical pr
ime than following an unrelated prime (repetition priming). In Experiment 1
A, targets viith distractors were named more slowly following an identical
prime than following an unrelated prime (negative priming), replicating Mil
liken, Joordens, Merikle, and Seiffert (Psychological Review, 1998). In Exp
eriments 1B and 2, repetition priming was reduced, although not reversed, f
or targets with distractors. The results of all three experiments are oppos
ite to the usual finding of enhanced priming for perceptually degraded targ
ets and suggest that response conflict engages retrospective mechanisms tha
t counteract the facilitatory effects of priming.