The phonological priming effect may reflect basic processes in spoken, word
perception and has thus been a central topic of recent research. In this j
ournal, Hamburger and Slowiaczek (1996) reported phonological priming data
collected in a shadowing task. They replicated a prior study (Slowiaczek &
Hamburger; 1992), but added new procedures to minimize bias. After observin
g inhibitory priming in a "low-expectancy" condition, they concluded that f
acilitatory priming reflects perceptual/response bias, but that inhibitory
priming reflects automatic processes of lexical access. This commentary cri
tiques Hamburger and Slowiaczek 's method and presents new data. that demon
strate persistent biases in primed shadowing. I suggest that such biases re
flect natural, context-sensitive listening strategies.