Consensus is the holy grail of bioethics, the lynch pin of the assumption t
hat well informed, well intentioned people may reach generally acceptable p
ositions on ethically contentious issues. It has been especially important
in bioethics, where advancing technology has assured an increasing field of
complex medical dilemmas. This paper results on the use of a multicriterio
n decision making system (MCDM) analyzing group process in an attempt to be
tter define hospital policy. In a pilot program at The Hospital for Sick Ch
ildren, Toronto, a series of small scale focus groups was constituted to ex
amine criteria defining organ transplant eligibility. Criteria were organiz
ed hierarchically using the Analytic Hierarchy Process, an MCDM approach, a
nd the resulting data was analyzed using Expert Choice 9.0, software design
ed to facilitate AHP analysis. Qualitative and quantitative analysis map ba
rriers to practical consensus in a way not previously possible.