Objective:Scores like APACHE (Acute Physiology And Chronic Health Evaluatio
n) were evaluated for unselected intensive care unit (ICU) admissions. Can
they also be used for risk stratification and quality assurance in selected
subgroups like elderly patients?
Methods: Over a 3-year period data of all admissions of a 12 bed interdisci
plinary ICU were collected. APACHE II and III scores and probabilities of h
ospital deaths were compared with observed outcomes. The discriminatory pow
er was evaluated by calculating the areas under the receiver operating char
acteristic (ROC) curves. Calibration was analyzed with standardized mortali
ty ratios (SMR) and the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit statistic.
Results: Of 3382 admissions due to exclusion criteria, 2795 patients were a
nalyzed, 1396 (49,9 %) of these were greater than or equal to 65 years, mea
n age 75 (65-99) years. 62.5 % were non-operative, 37.5 % postoperative adm
issions, 35 % after emergency operations. ICU mortality was 11.7 %, hospita
l mortality 25.1 %. The areas under the ROC curves were 0.77 for APACHE II
and 0.79 for APACHE III (whole collective 0.83 and 0.85, respectively). The
SMR was 1.17 for APACHE II and 1.23 for APACHE III: compared with 1.06 and
1.;22 for all patients, respectively. Calibration for elderly patients was
insufficient for APACHE IT (Hosmer-Lemeshow chi-square = 19, p < 0.025) as
well as for APACHE III (chi-square = 41, p < 0.001), while it was good for
all patients for APACHE II (chi-square = 12, p > 0.1) but not So for APACH
E III (chi-square = 48, p < 0.001).
Conclusions: APACHE II and III both show good discrimination for elderly pa
tients although a little inferior than for all patients. Both scores can be
used for risk stratification of elderly ICU patients. Mortality prognosis
is not sufficient for geriatric patients although APACHE II calibrates well
for all. Application of these scores for quality assurance in selected sub
groups like elderly patients cannot be recommended based on these data.