J. Vial et al., Validation of the use of an automatic diluter in HPLC analyses by comparison with traditional methods, ANALUSIS, 27(2), 1999, pp. 181-186
In an analysis protocol, dilution is nowadays the last step that is never (
or seldom) fully automated. Yet special appliances called diluters are comm
ercially available. In spite of the potential advantages in time and solven
t saving, analysts are still reluctant to use these diluters, mainly becaus
e of the insufficient proof that they are able to give accurate and precise
results. Validation by gravimetry did not represent an irrevocable argumen
t since it could not account for memory effect. That is the reason why we c
hose to carry out our validation of the dilution step in HPLC analyses with
an automatic diluter through a comparison with classical methods using fla
sks and pipettes or burettes. A parent solution made of concentrated Spiram
ycin was diluted by the various methods. The control analysis was operated
using HPLC with UV detection. The experimental design involved two operator
s and results obtained were processed using statistical tools such as ANOVA
and regression. Conclusions were that in any case the diluter was at least
as effective as traditional methods. Observed variability introduced by di
lution was 0.30% RSD with diluter, and 0.45% RSD with classical methods. In
addition, as was shown by the results of the lack of fit test, diluter acc
uracy is quite compatible with linearity studies in HPLC. Consequently, it
is possible and even advantageous to use a diluter instead of manual method
s.