A comparison of 1-naphthyl phosphate and 4 aminophenyl phosphate as enzymesubstrates for use with a screen-printed amperometric immunosensor for progesterone in cows' milk
Rm. Pemberton et al., A comparison of 1-naphthyl phosphate and 4 aminophenyl phosphate as enzymesubstrates for use with a screen-printed amperometric immunosensor for progesterone in cows' milk, BIOSENS BIO, 14(5), 1999, pp. 495-503
4-Aminophenyl phosphate (4-APP) and 1-naphthyl phosphate (1-NP) were compar
ed as enzyme substrates for an amperometric milk progesterone biosensor uti
lising progesterone-conjugated alkaline phosphatase in a competitive immuno
assay format. Cyclic voltammetry of the corresponding hydrolysis products,
4-aminophenol and 1-naphthol, at the surface of screen-printed carbon base
transducers, uncoated or coated with anti-progesterone monoclonal antibody
(mAb) showed well-defined anodic responses for both species, with the more
sensitive being 4-aminophenol. Scan rate studies produced evidence that sur
face mAb could impede the diffusion of 4-aminophenol, but not 1-naphthol, t
oward the electrode surface. This was supported by computer simulation for
the electrochemical rate constant (k(het)) using 4-aminophenol, which gave
Values at uncoated and mAb-coated electrodes of 6.5 x 10(-4) and 3.0 x 10(-
4) cm s(-1), respectively. The applied potential for oxidation of 4-aminoph
enol was 230 mV lower than for 1-naphthol. Nevertheless, by operating below
+400 mV versus a saturated calomel reference electrode, it was possible to
obtain a chronoamperometric signal for l-naphthol in the absence of electr
ochemical interference from milk. Using mAb-coated SPCEs, calibration curve
s were obtained for progesterone in oestrus whole cow's milk spiked with st
andard concentrations over the range 0-50 ng/ml, using either 4-APP or 1NP
as enzyme substrate. Precision values for triplicate sensors were 5.3-18.3%
for 4-APP and 4.1-12.4% for 1-NP. An assay of real whole milk samples from
different cows at various stages of the oestrus cycle produced correlation
s against a commercial EIA of r = 0.840 and 0.946 for 4-APP and 1-NP, respe
ctively. 1-NP possesses the advantages over 4-APP of being inexpensive, eas
y to obtain and soluble (1-naphthol cf. 4-aminophenol) at high pH. From the
se observations, it is concluded that 1-NP is the preferred substrate for u
se with our proposed milk progesterone biosensor. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science
S.A. All rights reserved.