Four previously published cases of dominant thalamic lesion in which the au
thor has participated are reviewed to gain a better understanding of thalam
ic participation in lexical-semantic functions. Naming deficits in two case
s support Nadeau and Crosson's (1997) hypothesis of a selective engagement
mechanism involving the frontal Lobes, inferior thalamic peduncle, nucleus
reticularis, and other thalamic nuclei, possibly the centromedian nucleus.
This mechanism selectively engages those cortical areas required to perform
a cognitive task, while maintaining other areas in a state of relative dis
engagement. Deficits in selective engagement disproportionately affect lexi
cal retrieval based on semantic input, as opposed to lexical and sublexical
processes, because the former is more dependent upon this attentional syst
em. The concept of selective engagement is also useful in understanding tha
lamic participation in working memory, as supported by data from one recent
functional neuroimaging study. Other processes also may be compromised in
more posterior thalamic lesions which damage the pulvinar but not other com
ponents of this selective engagement system. A third case with aphasia afte
r a more superior and posterior thalamic lesion also had oral reading error
s similar to those in neglect dyslexia. The pattern of deficits suggested a
visual processing problem in the early stages of reading. The fourth case
had a category-specific naming deficit after posterior thalamic lesion. Tak
en together, the latter two cases indicate that the nature of language func
tions in more posterior regions of the dominant thalamus depends upon the c
ortical connectivity of the thalamic region. Together, findings from the fo
ur cases suggest that thalamic nuclei and systems are involved in multiple
processes which directly or indirectly support cortical language functions,
(C) 1999 Academic Press.