This study investigates both qualitative and quantitative production of sen
tences produced by 113 writers between 10 to 13 year of age for justifying
points of views. Eight different production contexts were constructed from
the modalities of three factors (familiarity with the topic, acceptance of
the to be defended thesis and consensual opinion), such as they appear for
example in sentences like "eating candies is good because..." or "going on
a trip is not good, because...". The results clearly showed than from ten y
ears of age children were able to justify whichever point of view and its o
pposite by referring to specific information which are largely shared. Howe
ver, the number and the nature of the arguments varied as a function of con
texts. Children write more arguments when they have to defend a view which
conforms a consensual opinion, whereas they diversify their arguments by su
pporting points of views which do not conform a consensual perspective. The
lack of practice with the activity constitutes in both cases a favorable c
ondition. Within the framework of developing aids for school training and a
rgumentative writing, our findings show that it is possible to use with non
expert writers either contexts which favor quantitative production or cont
exts which bring to a qualitative diversification of arguments.