New Keynesian literature assumes symmetric industrial structure when analys
ing explanations of money non-neutrality. This paper analyses the impact of
modifying this assumption by allowing for a mixed industrial structure; so
me industries are characterized by monopolistic competition, others by perf
ect competition. The mixed industrial structure implies misallocation of la
bour between the different industries which may contribute to explanations
of non-neutrality of money. Following a 5% money increase, the menu costs n
eeded for non-neutrality may be 40 times smaller and ratio of welfare gain
over private loss more than 100 times larger than in the corresponding mode
l with a symmetric structure. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights res
erved. JEL classification. D40; E30; L16.