Decision-making in the colposcopy clinic - a critical analysis

Citation
J. Bornstein et al., Decision-making in the colposcopy clinic - a critical analysis, EUR J OB GY, 85(2), 1999, pp. 219-224
Citations number
38
Categorie Soggetti
Reproductive Medicine
Journal title
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY
ISSN journal
03012115 → ACNP
Volume
85
Issue
2
Year of publication
1999
Pages
219 - 224
Database
ISI
SICI code
0301-2115(199908)85:2<219:DITCC->2.0.ZU;2-N
Abstract
Objective: To consider the omission of several diagnostic steps from the ma nagement of patients with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (SIL) by analyzing the role of each step on the choice of treatment. Study design : Each diagnostic procedure was correlated to the treatment and outcome in 87 women with high-grade SIL. Treatments considered were large loop excisio n of the transformation zone (LLETZ), cold knife conization, and CO2 laser vaporization. Results: Unsatisfactory colposcopy (P less than or equal to 0 .01) and positive endocervical curettage (ECC) specimen (P less than or equ al to 0.01) were essential for choice of treatment. CIN2 diagnoses of the p reoperative cervical biopsy were rediagnosed as CIN3 based on the surgical specimen in 57% of the cases. The margins of 33 and 23% of surgical specime ns removed by LLETZ or knife conization, respectively, displayed CIN involv ement. Forty and 47% of these patients, respectively, later developed recur rent GIN. Conclusions: Omission of colposcopy and ECC could have resulted i n sub-optimal treatment in many cases. Excision by LLETZ or knife conizatio n is recommended for cases of CIN2 and CIN3. Follow up is imperative for pa tients with involvement of the margins. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Ireland L td. All rights reserved.