Re. West et al., The profiles of human and primate [H-3]N-alpha-methylhistamine binding differ from that of rodents, EUR J PHARM, 377(2-3), 1999, pp. 233-239
Characterization of the histamine H-3 receptor in rodent species has been e
xtensive but limited characterization has been done with primate or human t
issue. We have characterized the binding of [H-3]N-alpha-methylhistamine to
cynomolgus monkey and human brain membranes to determine whether there are
any significant differences among species' pharmacology. In monkey, [H-3]N
-alpha-methylhistamine bound, in a guanine nucleotide-sensitive fashion, to
an apparently homogeneous class of sites at equilibrium (K-D = 1.4 nM, B-m
ax = 34 fmol/mg protein). The profile of binding was broadly similar to tha
t of rodents, with a couple of significant differences. Most notably, the p
otency of the histamine H-3-receptor-specific antagonist thioperamide (K-i
= 240 nM) was substantially less than reported for rodents and under assay
conditions that yield a two-site curve fit in rodents only a single class o
f thioperamide binding sites was detected in monkey. Burimamide, however, y
ielded a two-site curve fit (K-iH = 6.7 nM, K-iL = 1100 nM) independent of
the presence of sodium in the assay, as it does in rodents. Characterizatio
n of the human brain histamine H-3 receptor showed that it was similar to t
he monkey and not rodent receptor. Our findings indicate that differences b
etween primate and rodent histamine H-3 receptors of potentially serious im
portance for the discovery of antagonists active in humans do exist. (C) 19
99 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.