Objectives: to compare the clinical outcome of in situ and reversed bypass
grafting.
Design: multicentre, prospective, non-randomised study.
Patients and methods: five-hundred patients with an in situ graft and 955 p
atients with a reversed graft were compared regarding graft occlusion, the
need for graft revision, and limb salvage.
Results: two-year assisted primary patency of femoropopliteal bypass proced
ures was 82% for in situ and 82% for reversed grafts. The corresponding haz
ard ratio (HR) for occlusion was 1.27 (95% CI 0.91-1.77). The 2-year assist
ed primary patency of femorocrural bypass procedures was 69% for in situ vs
. 70% for reversed grafts. The corresponding HR was 1.13 (95% CI 0.73-1.75)
. Adjustment for relevant baseline variables did not change the results. Mo
re reinterventions were needed to maintain integrity and patency of the in
situ graft especially in crural bypasses. No differences in limb salvage ra
tes were seen.
Conclusions: reversed and in situ vein grafts have similar patency and limb
salvage rates for both femoropopliteal and femorocrural bypass procedures.
The in situ graft needs more secondary interventions.