E. Mcinnes et al., Can GP input into discharge planning result in better outcomes for the frail aged: results from a randomized controlled trial, FAM PRACT, 16(3), 1999, pp. 289-293
Objective. We aimed to assess whether GP input into discharge planning for
high-risk aged in-patients admitted under the care of a geriatrician result
s in improved patient outcomes.
Methods. We conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial in Sydney,
Australia. The subjects were 364 patients aged 60 years and over. The main
outcome measures included community service referral, accommodation changes
, length of stay, readmission rate, length of time to first readmission and
patient satisfaction with discharge arrangements.
Results. No significant differences were found with regard to length of sta
y, readmission rates or time to first readmission. Test-group subjects were
significantly more likely to be recommended for community services at disc
harge and to report that hospital personnel had discussed their discharge p
lan with them. Significantly more of the test group reported that their ret
urn home was well prepared.
Conclusions. Although GP pre-discharge visits did not alter the likelihood
of 'hard outcomes such as risk of readmission', the results suggest that qu
ality of care is enhanced amongst patients receiving a pre-discharge visit
and that GPs can perform a key role in planning post-discharge care with ot
her services.