P. Schoenfeld et al., Accuracy of polyp detection by gastroenterologists and nurse endoscopists during flexible sigmoidoscopy: A randomized trial, GASTROENTY, 117(2), 1999, pp. 312-318
Background & Aims: The use of nurse endoscopists to perform flexible sigmoi
doscopy is expanding, increasing the availability of colorectal cancer scre
ening. However, the effectiveness of this practice has not been studied in
randomized trials. The aim of this trial was to examine the miss rate of po
lyps, the depth of sigmoidoscope insertion, and the incidence of complicati
ons during flexible sigmoidoscopy performed by nurse endoscopists and by ga
stroenterologists. Methods: Three hundred twenty-eight patients were random
ized to undergo screening flexible sigmoidoscopy performed by a nurse endos
copist or by a gastroenterologist. Frequency of missed polyps was determine
d by repeat sigmoidoscopy, performed by a gastroenterologist blinded to the
identity of the first endoscopist. Multiple logistic regression analysis i
dentified characteristics associated with missed polyps. Results: Gastroent
erologists and nurse endoscopists had equivalent miss rates for adenomatous
polyps (20% vs. 21%, respectively; P = 0.91). No complications occurred in
any patient. Gastroenterologists inserted the sigmoidoscope further than n
urse endoscopists (61 vs. 55 cm, respectively; P < 0.00001). Polyp location
in the descending colon (odds ratio, 4.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.7-10.
3) was highly associated with missed polyps. Conclusions: No differences in
detection of adenomatous polyps or frequency of complications were found.
These data suggest that experienced nurse endoscopists may perform screenin
g flexible sigmoidoscopy as safely and as effectively as gastroenterologist
s.