E. Paterson et al., Carbon partitioning and rhizosphere C-flow in Lolium perenne as affected by CO2 concentration, irradiance and below-ground conditions, GL CHANGE B, 5(6), 1999, pp. 669-678
Plant responses to increasing atmospheric CO2 concentrations have received
considerable interest. However, major uncertainties in relation to interact
ive effects of CO2 with above- and below-ground conditions remain. This mic
rocosm study investigated the impacts of CO2 concentration on plant growth,
dry matter partitioning and rhizodeposition as affected by: (i) photon flu
x density (PFD), and (ii) growth matrix. Plants were grown in a sandy loam
soil for 28 d under two photon flux densities: 350 (low PFD) and 1000 mu mo
l m(-2) s(-1) (high PFD) and two CO2 concentrations: 450 (low CO2) and 720
mu mol mol(-1) (high CO2). Partitioning of recent assimilate amongst plant
and rhizosphere C-pools was determined by use of (CO2)-C-14 pulse-labelling
. In treatments with high PFD and/or high CO2, significant (P< 0.05) increa
ses in dry matter production were found in comparison with the low PFD/low
CO2 treatment. In addition, significant (P < 0.05) reductions in shoot %N a
nd SLA were found in treatments imposing high PFD and/or high CO2. Root wei
ght ratio (RWR) was unaffected by CO2 concentration, however, partitioning
of C-14 to below ground pools was significantly (P< 0.05) increased. In a s
eparate study, L. perenne was grown for 28 d in microcosms percolated with
nutrient solution, in either a sterile sand matrix or nonsterile soil, unde
r high or low CO2. Dry matter production was significantly (P< 0.01) increa
sed for both sand and soil grown seedlings. Dry matter partitioning was aff
ected by matrix type. C-14-allocation below ground was increased for sand g
rown plants. Rhizodeposition was affected by CO2 concentration for growth i
n each matrix, but was increased for plants grown in the soil matrix, and d
ecreased for those in sand. The results illustrate that plant responses to
CO2 are potentially affected by (i) PFD, and (ii) by feedbacks from the gro
wth matrix. Such feedbacks are discussed in relation to soil nutrient statu
s and interactions with the rhizosphere microbial biomass.