The research literature suggests that current dental polymeric composites a
re not chemically inert at the material/biological interface. Several studi
es have investigated the process of "biodegradation" on dental composites i
n the presence of enzymes, by monitoring changes in weight loss and surface
hardness properties. However, it is hypothesized that these methods can pr
ovide an erroneous measure of biochemically induced degradation, since they
are less sensitive to molecular events and lack the ability to provide che
mical information. Knowledge of the latter is important because it relates
to the biological significance of biodegradation, i.e., the identification
and quantification of released compounds that may be capable of influencing
cell, bacteria, or enzyme function. It was the objective of this study to
compare three methods (weight loss, surface microhardness, and liquid chrom
atography combined with mass spectrometry) for their ability to measure the
effect of enzyme-induced biodegradation on three commercial composite resi
n materials. The enzyme was cholesterol esterase, and the composites were S
ilux Plus XL, Z100 A2 (3M),and TPH XL (L.D. Caulk). Biodegradation was read
ily detected by liquid chromatography, and its sensitivity was shown to be
substantially greater than that of weight loss or surface hardness measurem
ents, although surface hardness measurements did show some agreement with l
iquid chromatography data. The data also indicated that the levels and dist
ribution of released degradation products can vary substantially from one p
roduct to the next, and that this merits further investigation if the poten
tial impact of different commercial restorative materials on cell and bacte
ria function is to be assessed.