This paper uses calibrated versions of a sticky-price currency-substitution
model to compare the initial dynamics and welfare costs of three ty pes of
stabilization program: exchange-rate-based (ERB), money-based (MB), and mo
ney-based with initial reliquefication (MBR). ERB and MBR programs are foun
d to induce an initial expansion in real activity, whereas MB programs are
initially contractionary. The welfare gains of eliminating high inflation a
re significant under permanent ERB and MBR programs hut small under permane
nt MB programs. In addition, temporary MB programs are shown to be much mor
e disruptive than temporary ERB or MBR programs. These results provide an e
xplanation for why MB programs are so rarely implemented and suggest that e
mpirical studies that fail to distinguish MB from MBR programs are likely t
o be biased toward finding that stabilizations are always expansionary rega
rdless of the nominal anchor. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights res
erved. JEL classification: F41.