Coffee and tea consumption in the Scottish Heart Health Study follow up: conflicting relations with coronary risk factors, coronary disease, and all cause mortality

Citation
M. Woodward et H. Tunstall-pedoe, Coffee and tea consumption in the Scottish Heart Health Study follow up: conflicting relations with coronary risk factors, coronary disease, and all cause mortality, J EPIDEM C, 53(8), 1999, pp. 481-487
Citations number
26
Categorie Soggetti
Envirnomentale Medicine & Public Health","Medical Research General Topics
Journal title
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH
ISSN journal
0143005X → ACNP
Volume
53
Issue
8
Year of publication
1999
Pages
481 - 487
Database
ISI
SICI code
0143-005X(199908)53:8<481:CATCIT>2.0.ZU;2-G
Abstract
Study objective-To relate habitual (cups per day) tea and coffee consumptio n to conventional coronary risk factors and subsequent risk of coronary hea rt disease and death. Design-Cohort study. Setting-Nationwide random population study. Participants-Over 11 000 men and women aged 40-59 who took part in the Scot tish Heart Health Study lifestyle and risk factor survey in 1984-87. Partic ipants were followed up to the end of 1993, an average of 7.7 years, for al l cause mortality, coronary death, or any major coronary event (death, non- fatal infarction or coronary artery surgery). Cox's proportional hazards re gression model was used to estimate the hazard in consumers of tea and coff ee relative to the zero consumption group, both before and after correction for other factors. Main results-Coffee and tea consumption showed a strong inverse relation. F or many conventional risk factors, coffee showed a weak, but beneficial, gr adient with increasing consumption, whereas increasing tea consumption show ed the reverse. Increasing coffee consumption was associated with beneficia l effects fbr mortality and coronary morbidity, whereas tea showed the oppo site. Adjusting for age and social class had some effect in reducing associ ations. Multiple adjustment for other risk factors removed the associations for tea and most of those for coffee although there was a residual benefit of coffee consumption in avoiding heart disease among men. Conclusions-The epidemiological differences shown in this study occurred de spite the pharmacological similarities between tea and coffee. Either they differ more than is realised, or they identify contrasting associated lifes tyle and health risks, for which this multiple adjustment was inadequate.