Conservation tillage techniques have gained widespread, but not universal,
use in irrigated corn (Zea mays L.) production. This study was conducted to
evaluate yield impacts associated with conservation tillage methods when c
ompared with conventional techniques in a replicated field experiment for 1
7 consecutive years in Nebraska (1976-1992). Six tillage treatments were im
posed on continuous corn production and replicated three times. Tillage tre
atments ranged from traditional (disk and surface plant) to no-till (slot p
lant on existing ridge). Post-plant operations were uniformly applied to ac
commodate furrow irrigation. Over the life of the project the conservation
tillage treatments (ridge tilt, rotary till, and slot plant) had a 4 bu/acr
e increase in grain yield over the conventional treatments (those having ch
isel, disk, or lister operations). The advantage of the conservation tillag
e systems was amplified by corresponding lower production costs. The rotary
, ridge, and slot tillage systems had $7.72, $14.22, and $16.22/acre lower
annual tillage and herbicide costs (1990 dollars), respectively, than the c
onventional tillage system with a disking operation. The conservation tilla
ge treatments significantly lowered stalk rot and residual spring soil nitr
ate N concentrations. Other comparisons showing significant differences wer
e list vs. chisel and disk for harvest population and soil potassium concen
trations, and ridge vs, rotary for harvest population. None of the other co
mparisons tested had significant differences for grain yield or other soil
parameters. Overall, this study indicates that conservation tillage on irri
gated continuous-corn is advantageous over conventional methods.