A. Helewa et al., Does strengthening the abdominal muscles prevent low back pain - A randomized controlled trial, J RHEUMATOL, 26(8), 1999, pp. 1808-1815
Objective. To investigate the effects of abdominal muscle strengthening exe
rcise on low back pain (LBP)risk reduction.
Methods. We compared the effects of abdominal muscle strength (AMS) exercis
e and back education with back education only on 402 asymptomatic subjects
with weak AMS, The primary outcome was the percentage of subjects with at l
east one episode of LBP at 24 months. A diary was used to monitor complianc
e.
Results. There were no statistically significant differences between experi
mental (E) and control (C) subjects at 24 months for LBP episodes (E: 34.7%
, C: 30.4%; C - E = -4.2%, P2 = 0.481; 95% CI -16.1%, 7.6%). The LBP episod
es were also not statistically significantly different at 6 months (E: 13.2
%, C: 16.1%; C - E: 2.9%, P2 = 0.493; 95% CI-5.3%, 11.0%) or at 12 months (
E: 24.8%, C: 23.6%; C - E = -1.2%, P2 = 0.818; 95% CI -11.6%, 9.2%). Adjust
ing the data for strata and base line AMS did not alter the findings. Imput
ed results for LBP episodes at 6 months (C - E: 4.8%, P2 = 0.191; 95% CI-2.
4%, 12.0%), 12 months (C - E: -1.0%, P2 = 0.821; 95% CI -9.5%, 7.6%), and 2
4 months (C - E: -3.3%, P2 = 0.483; 95% CI -12.6%, 5.9%) were also not stat
istically significantly different,
Conclusion. Back education and abdominal exercise instructions are similar
to back education alone. There were no group differences in LBP episodes, p
ossibly due to noncompliance with the exercise program. While the estimated
benefit of 2.9% at 6 months from the complete data and 4.8% from the imput
ed data were not statistically significant, a larger study or future metaan
alyses may be needed to confirm whether there is a clinical benefit or whet
her these results should be considered a chance finding.