Control of charging damage is a critical issue in both current and future i
on implantation systems. The development of sub-0.18 mu m devices will make
control of wafer charging more difficult and more important. In addition,
sub-0.18 mu m devices will require novel doping technologies such as ultral
ow energy ion implanters or plasma doping, PLAD. Here, we examine the effic
acy of two, very distinct, charging monitors. They are Varian Research Cent
er's, VRC, antenna-MOS devices, and CHARM-2 devices. Some of the limitation
s and advantages of each test device are examined. In addition, results fro
m implantations using both PLAD and a traditional beamline system are repor
ted. It is found that the results from the VRC devices are consistent with
production results while correlations with CHARM-2 results are less clear.
It is shown in this article that these differences are due to the fundament
al nature of the CHARM technique combined with how modern ion implanters op
erate. It is also noted that CHARM is well suited for examining charging da
mage in steady state processes, but these same concerns for the reliability
of predictions based on CHARM-2 data will arise for any ion/plasma process
in which the current to the surface undergoes rapid variations. (C) 1999 A
merican Vacuum Society. [S0734-2101(99)09104-6].